Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Little vs Jacob Bradshaw Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Little vs Bradshaw analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Little vs Jacob Bradshaw Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Little 0 - 0 Bradshaw
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Little has won 48.44% of points on their second serve, while Bradshaw has won 53.34%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Little, in recent form, has won 51.01% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bradshaw has won 52.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.02% and 33.29% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Little has saved 62.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bradshaw has saved 62.19% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Little has won 41.67% of matches played (W/L 10/ 14), with Bradshaw winning 55.56% (W/L 40/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Little has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 8). Bradshaw has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 106/ 67), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Little has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45.45% of matches (W/L 10/ 12), where as Bradshaw has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.68% of matches (W/L 37/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Little has played against opponents with an average rank of 102.29 while Bradshaw has played against players with an average rank of 123.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Little has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bradshaw has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Little has converted 43.08% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bradshaw has converted 46.88% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
843
Rank
564
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
549
Rank
548
High
21
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
56% (98-77)
Career Total W/L
60% (110-74)
50% (7-7)
YTD W/L
56% (18-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Daniel Little vs Jacob Bradshaw For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Little VS Bradshaw
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Little | Jacob Bradshaw |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (7/7) | 56% (18/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (14/15) | 57% (39/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (140/133) | 52% (348/318) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 58% (18/13) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.59 | 0.36 |
| Aces Total | 78 | 117 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 23 | 70 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:17 | 1:48:41 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 56.36 | 135.25 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (500/853) | 61% (1256/2074) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (366/500) | 69% (866/1256) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (171/353) | 53% (433/818) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (28/65) | 46% (88/192) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (308/837) | 40% (821/2074) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 54% (7/6) | 65% (17/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (7/14) | 58% (18/31) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 62% (8/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 89% (19/17) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 11% (19/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 8% (13/1) |
Daniel Little Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Mark Lajal
Player
Daniel Little
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
44%
(
21 of
48)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luc Fomba
Player
Daniel Little
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Samir Hamza Reguig
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
57
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Demetris Azoides
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Daniel Little
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
11 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Rayane Oumaouche
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Daniel Little
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Joshua Charlton
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
78%
(
70 of
90)
12
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
47 of
70)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 7-6(2) 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Mason Naumovski
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Daniel Little
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jacob Bradshaw Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jesse Flores
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Rushil Khosla
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Mohammad Alkotop
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
8
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Max Wiskandt
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Moritz Kudernatsch
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Niklas Schell
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
104)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
9
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Ifi
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
53%
(
41 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louis Dussin
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
50%
(
53 of
106)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
21 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(7) 7-6(5) 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Little Vs Bradshaw Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Little are available here and Bradshaw photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
